Industries in Illinois and Michigan can boost competitiveness, save energy, and reach climate goals through industrial electrification, but electric rate structures are standing in the way.
Illinois has high energy savings potential through electrification compared to other states because low-temperature process heat represents a higher fraction of total industrial heat demand compared to other states. Industrial electrification is likely needed to help Illinois reach its climate targets.
Michigan, despite its ambitious climate goals, is one of the most gas-dependent states in the country. Industrial heat pumps (IHPs) would improve efficiency and reduce emissions in Michigan’s industrial sector, particularly in the food and beverage and automotive sectors. Electrification is consistent with the state’s MI Healthy Climate Plan and recently passed clean energy laws.
To achieve these outcomes, utilities will need to restructure industrial tariffs. However, utilities face a number of barriers to developing new rate structures that are supportive of large, flexible new electrical loads.
Targeted industrial rates and programs can also effectively support industrial electrification. Programs that offer discounted energy and demand charges for pilot projects and fuel switching initiatives can help drive adoption.
Lessons from other sectors can help guide industrial electrification efforts. Examples include heat pump–specific rates for residential customers, electric vehicle rates that direct load to specific times of day, and data center–specific rates that support large loads.
Legislative efforts can support industrial electrification through bills that encourage new flexible loads, prioritize clean energy, and shift peak demand. By introducing new policies, legislators spark key stakeholder dialog that informs ongoing utility proceedings and rate design.
Electrification of low- to medium-temperature industrial process heat is one of the most promising and accessible pathways for manufacturers to increase competitiveness, improve efficiency, modernize facilities, and save energy in the near term. Electrification can also help states and utilities meet energy goals, manage energy sources, and reduce air pollution. Electric industrial heat pumps (IHPs), for example, can reduce energy use associated with generating industrial process heat by up to one-third (Rightor et al. 2022).
This white paper investigates how energy bills change as industrial facilities electrify operations, with a focus on two Midwestern states, Illinois and Michigan. We find that electrification increases energy costs across all the rate tariffs studied. As a result, we highlight the opportunity to (a) change or create rate structures, also known as tariffs, to support electrification, and (b) start programs that encourage flexible heating loads in industry.
Midwestern utility regulators, rate developers, and program designers can turn to multiple sources for best practices, as we explore in this paper. First, they can look outside of the Midwest for design ideas for the industrial sector, such as BC Hydro’s “clean energy” rate that offered incentives covering energy and demand charges over a seven-year lifetime. Second, they can turn to other sectors for ideas on more nuanced time-of-use or coincident peak rates. These rates incentivize more flexible demand, including energy storage or behind-the-meter generation to build flexible capacity. Third, they can develop special electrification rates that are based on separate meters for incremental new electrified demand; the goal is to reduce the impact of demand charges while still meeting cost-of-service requirements. Finally, they can partner with state policymakers to develop tax credits or granting programs that can offset financial burden for electrifying manufacturing facilities and help to overcome larger spark gaps (the price differential between average electricity and gas prices at the facility).
As industry electrifies, traditional cost allocation runs the risk of shifting a disproportionate burden onto early adopters. Utilities should not necessarily be required to subsidize electrification or provide discounts, but electrifying facilities should not be penalized by legacy rate designs that were never intended for new, large loads (DOE 2025). Fair allocation would mean aligning charges with the costs customers actually impose on the system and using targeted tools to incentivize decarbonization where it makes sense. Electrifying industrials should not have to pay more because tariffs were designed without these factors in mind.
Toward Best Practices for Industrial Innovation: Lessons from the Department of Energy’s Industrial Demonstrations Program
This paper highlights a central lesson for policymakers: Industrial innovation requires alignment across government programs (grants, procurement), financing mechanisms (tax credits, loans), and institutional capacity. When these three are backed by sustained commitment from the public sector, private industry, and external stakeholders, the transition from demonstration to deployment becomes viable.
Bridging the Equity Gap for Utility Energy Efficiency Programs
Utility energy efficiency programs have increased investment in low-income households, but significant gaps remain. This report examines spending and savings trends across 48 major U.S. utilities, identifies barriers to expanding low-income programs and highlights policies and program strategies that can improve energy affordability and equitable access to efficiency upgrades.
This report identifies pathways for India’s cement industry to decarbonise at a pace compatible with the national climate goal of net-zero emissions by 2070.
Industrial Capital Investment Decisions: Pathways to Energy Program Engagement
New research explores how firms make energy investment decisions
Support the Work That Makes Energy Go Further
ACEEE’s independent research and advocacy depend on the support of foundations, businesses, and individuals committed to cutting energy bills, waste, and climate pollution.
