Providing Utility Energy Efficiency Programs in an Era of Tight Budgets: Maximizing Long-Term Energy Savings While Minimizing Utility Costs
Steven Nadel
1996
Executive Summary
In the past two years, the dominant topic of discussion among utility companies,
regulators, and other utility industry observers has been increased competition
in the utility industry, including increased wholesale competition as well
as the coming of retail competition. The general tenor of these discussions
is that increased competition is coming (although there is a wide range of
opinions as to what form[s] this increased competition will take and how
long the transition will take) and that utilities should begin preparing
for this increased competition now, primarily by reducing costs wherever
possible.
In this report, we do not attempt to discuss the coming of increased competition
to the utility industry, nor do we discuss the advisability of undertaking
major cost-cutting efforts at this time (these topics are discussed in another
ACEEE paper--Nadel, Geller, and Pye 1995). We also do not discuss the best
structure(s) for delivering energy efficiency services in the post-competitive
age (this is the topic of an upcoming ACEEE report). Instead, we begin with
the understanding that many utilities are now trying to reduce costs, and
one area where they are looking for cost savings is in budgets for energy
efficiency programs. While most utilities understand that energy efficiency
has many benefits for society, in an effort to cut costs, as part of broader
cost-cutting efforts, many utilities are seeking to lower the amount of money
they spend on energy efficiency programs. In some cases utilities are trying
to reduce energy efficiency budgets in absolute terms, in other cases they
are seeking to slow the growth in energy efficiency budgets. In an effort
to assist with utility efforts to "get the most bang for the buck," in this
report we attempt to summarize current thinking and research on how to maximize
long-term, sustained energy savings while minimizing costs. Also, in some
cases, energy efficiency programs will not be offered by utilities but instead
will be offered by other independent entities, such as energy service companies
or agencies affiliated with state government. These organizations will also
be interested in maximizing savings within budget constraints. In discussing
reduced costs, we focus on costs to the utility (or the non-utility implementing
entity) instead of costs to society because utilities are primarily interested
in lowering their costs, in an effort to keep electricity rates down.
The focus of this report is on energy efficiency strategies utilities can
use during the transition period from a heavily regulated market to a more
competitive market. Until the forms of increased competition are decided,
it is premature to recommend energy efficiency strategies for the competitive
age. However, many of the strategies discussed below could serve as a cornerstone
of energy efficiency efforts in a highly competitive market.
Click to order hard copy.
51 pp., 1996, $13.00 U963
Return to Top
|