Exploring the Relationship Between Demand Response and Energy
Efficiency: A Review of Experience and Discussion of Key Issues
Dan York and Martin
Kushler
Summary
"Demand-response"
programs and technologies have been heralded in recent years as
a great advancement in providing customers new options for managing
their energy costs and use along with providing energy suppliers
new options for assuring reliable supply at reasonable costs. Proponents
of demand-response programs tout numerous benefits from such options,
including improved system reliability, cost avoidance, greater market
efficiency, improved risk management, reduced negative environmental
impacts, improved customer service, and market power mitigation.
Crisis and near-crisis conditions and events have spurred the development
and practice of demand response in many states and regions.
In this project
we examined experience with demand-response programs in the United
States to capture a comprehensive picture of the state of this practice
to date. We reviewed program experiences and also identified gaps
in available knowledge about such programs.
A key objective
of this project was to examine the relationship between energy efficiency
and demand response. Demand-response programs seek to reduce peak
demands during times when reliability may be threatened or wholesale
market prices are high. However, reducing demand is not the same
as saving energy, although there are clearly relationships between
reducing peak power demand (kilowatts [kW]) and saving energy (kilowatt-hours
[kW]). There may be "spill-over" impacts on overall, non-peak
energy use from demand-response programs. Programs also may target
both objectives.
In our review
we have observed that experience to date with demand-response programs
has generally been positive. Scores of the different types of demand-response
programs have been offered and are in place across the United States.
Many have their origins in the practice of utility demand-side management
from the 1980s and 1990s. Certain states and regions have been especially
active in developing and offering demand-response programs, notably
California, New England, the Northwest, and New York and other Middle
Atlantic states, but programs can be found in most states.
View
the report for free in PDF (only the main body and Appendix A can
be viewed for free in pdf) or click
to order hard copy.
126 pp., March
2005, $55.00, U052
|