A Choice of Two Paths:
Energy Savings From Pending Federal Energy Legislation
Steven Nadel, R.
Neal Elliott, and Therese
Langer
April 2005
Executive Summary
The United States faces
a fork in the road in regard to energy policy. For the past five
years, the U.S. Congress and the present Administration have been
working on comprehensive energy legislation. Legislation passed
both Houses of Congress in both 2002 and 2003, but could never be
finalized due to a variety of contentious issues. In 2003, House-Senate
conferees concluded an agreement, but the agreement could not summon
the 60 votes needed for passage in the Senate. In 2005, Congress
will be trying again.
In seeking
to develop legislation, members of Congress need to decide whether
they are prepared to make the compromises needed to enact broadly
supported legislation that will truly address our nation's energy
problems, or whether they will instead continue to work on legislation
that puts "band-aids" on our nation's energy problems,
while leaving the tough choices for the future.
In this report
we do not address all elements of a comprehensive energy bill. Instead,
we concentrate on what we believe should be the foundation of any
energy plan or energy billusing energy as efficiently and cost-effectively
as possible. This report focuses on three policy option packages:
the energy efficiency provisions in two current energy bills and
one "enhanced" policy package:
- Those in
the 2003 House-Senate Conference Report (commonly referred to
by its bill numberH.R. 6) (U.S. Congress 2003);
- Those in
a bill just introduced by Senator Lamar Alexander (R-TN) entitled
the Natural Gas Price Reduction Act of 2005 (S. 726, 2005);
and
- An enhanced
legislative package that includes the best efficiency provisions
of H.R. 6 and S. 726, plus selected additional efficiency provisions
that would significantly increase energy savings.
First we review
the policy option packages. Then we estimate the energy savings
from each of these packages in 2010, in 2020, and on a cumulative
basis over the 2006-2010 and 2006-2020 periods. As part of this
analysis, we look at overall U.S. energy savings, as well as electricity
savings (both electricity use and peak demand savings), natural
gas savings, oil savings, and reductions in carbon dioxide emissions.
Our methodology and key assumptions are discussed in the body of
the report. In the final section, we put these analysis results
in a broader context and draw some conclusions. The intent of this
effort is to provide objective information to policy makers as they
shape what ultimately goes into legislation and also to provide
information to a broader public about the benefits and costs of
investing in energy efficiency resources so they can judge how well
the policy makers have done.
View
the entire report for free in PDF or click to order in hard
copy.
39 pp., 2005,
$17.00, E051
|