Appliance and Equipment Efficiency Standards: History, Impacts,
Current Status, and Future Directions
Steven Nadel and David Goldstein
It has been more than twenty years since the first appliance efficiency
standards were enacted in the United States. In the initial years
appliance standard discussions were marked by bitter debates but
by the early 1990s a middle ground had been found in which manufacturers,
states, and energy efficiency advocates often worked together to
negotiate consensual national efficiency standards that preempted
standards set by states. Standards set in this manner are producing
substantial reductions in U.S. energy use (more than 2.5 percent
of U.S. energy use, once existing standards are fully implemented)
while maintaining a benefit-cost ratio of more than 3:1.
In 1994/1995, this apparent consensus broke down,
due to some particularly controversial draft standards the U.S.
Department of Energy (DOE) proposed in early 1994 and also due to
the November 1994 election after which members opposed to regulation
took hold of Congress. Equipment manufacturers sought to take advantage
of this new state of affairs and incapacitate the standards program.
As of early 1996, Congress had imposed a one-year moratorium on
setting new standards, and DOE also had developed, with extensive
stakeholder input, a series of reforms to improve the standard-setting
process. Substantial savings are at stake&emdash;standards now under
development could reduce projected U.S. energy use by more than
1.5 percent, raising total savings to more than 4 percent of U.S.
energy use.
Over the short term, the future of the standards
program is unclear, as some manufacturers are working to extend
the moratorium on new standards while these and other manufacturers
are negotiating with DOE and efficiency advocates on additional
modifications to the program. At the same time, several states,
frustrated by the hold-up at the federal level, are again considering
setting state standards. In the long term, the future of the standards
process appears brighter, as factors such as increased concern about
global climate change, increased state and international standards
activity, increased use of voluntary market-driven programs to lay
the groundwork for new standards, and changes in the political winds
from Washington are likely to combine to put the standards program
back on track.