FOR IMMEDIATE
RELEASE
September 23, 2004
WASHINGTON, D.C. -- Each year's delay in setting three
new Department of Energy appliance efficiency standards costs consumers
and businesses billions of dollars in higher energy bills, according
to a major new study released today. The delay increases annual
energy use by 3.3 million megawatt hours of electricity and by 11
billion cubic feet of natural gasenough electricity to power
about 330,000 typical U.S homes and natural gas to heat about 170,000
homes.
"Across two administrations, DOE has missed one legal deadline
after another for reviewing and upgrading efficiency standardsit's
been a bipartisan failure," said Andrew deLaski, Executive Director
of the Appliance Standards Awareness Project and a principal author
of the report. "For just the three products labeled as 'high priority'
by DOE, each year of delay costs consumers and businesses over $7
billion dollars in higher energy costs over the lifetimes of the
additional inefficient equipment sold."
DOE named development of new standards for residential furnaces
and boilers, commercial air conditioners, and distribution transformers
its "high priorities" in 2001. Since then, DOE has repeatedly missed
self-imposed deadlines for advancing new standards. DOE finally
issued initial proposals in August. Under Departmental procedures,
following the "high priority" designation, initial proposals should
have been out by late 2002 and final new standards this fall. According
to deLaski, with these latest delays, new standards are as much
as a decade late. Congress required a new furnace standard by 1994
and a new transformer standard by 1996.
"Enormous energy savings are at stake," said Steven Nadel, Executive
Director of the American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy
and another principal author of the report. "Strong standards for
these three products could slash U.S. electricity demand by about
22,000 megawatts, eliminating the need for as many as 70 new power
plants in the years ahead."
According to the report, the new standards would save consumers
and businesses $22 billion (2004$) net of increases in product prices
due to the standards while cutting key pollutants that contribute
to air quality problems and global warming.
"The $22 billion of benefits from these standards could not come
at a better time," according to Kateri Callahan, President of the
Alliance to Save Energy. "Energy users need efficient appliances
and equipment to manage energy costs that seem to increase daily.
These standards are a big step in that direction."
The initial proposals issued by DOE in August include extensive
technical and economic analysis that generally indicates that significantly
more stringent standards are justified. Callahan commented that
the quality analytical groundwork that DOE has now completed should
provide a basis for DOE moving forward with no further delays.
"We hope that, with the initial proposals finally out, DOE can
get itself back on track and complete new standards soon," said
Nadel. "We are also reaching out to manufacturers and other key
stakeholders to see whether consensus agreements on standards for
these products can be negotiated," he continued, noting that "DOE
generally moves more quickly on consensus than contested standards."
Furnace Standards Would Yield Biggest Savings and Biggest Controversy
The report's authors found that among the three "high priority"
standards, the largest energy and economic savings would come from
updating the furnace and boiler standard. But achieving these savings
may prove controversial. Currently, DOE only regulates the oil and
gas use of furnaces, ignoring the electricity consumed by furnace
fans, despite the fact that, in a typical home, a furnace fan uses
twice as much electricity as a new refrigerator. Furthermore, DOE
sets one national standard, undifferentiated for climatic differences.
"A one-size-fits-all national furnace standard ignores the fact
that it's much colder in Minnesota than in Mississippi," said deLaski.
"DOE could fix this problem by setting two standardsone for cold
weather states and one for the rest of the country."
In its preliminary proposals, DOE asserted that it lacks legal
authority to regulate furnace electricity consumption or to set
a cold weather state standard. Efficiency supporters will testify
in hearings next week that DOE must do both to meet the letter and
intent of the appliance standards law that requires the agency to
set standards at levels that maximize energy efficiency and that
are "technologically feasible and economically justified."
"With yet another winter of sky-high heating bills around the
corner, it's a horrible time for DOE to walk away from its responsibility
of establishing common-sense furnace efficiency standards," said
Nadel.
DOE will hold public hearings for these three standards next week
and accept public comment through November. Under its normal procedures,
DOE would review those comments, complete further analysis, and
issue a proposed rule in about one year and follow that proposal
with a final rule about six months later. For most products, the
new standards would go into effect three years after the final rule
is published.
In addition to being behind on the current rulemakings, DOE has
missed legal deadlines for another dozen products. The report issued
today includes an appendix with state-by-state estimates of the
impact such new standards would have on energy use, energy bills,
and the environment.
Powerful Priorities: Updating Energy Efficiency Standards for
Residential Furnaces, Commercial Air Conditioners, and Distribution
Transformers can be downloaded for free at http://www.standardsasap.org/a043_full.pdf
or purchased
online from ACEEE for $40 plus $5 postage and handling from
ACEEE Publications, 1001 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Suite 801, Washington,
D.C. 20036-5525, phone: 202-429-0063, fax: 202-429-0193, and e-mail:
aceee_publications@aceee.org.