|
Heating,
cooling, and ventilating commercial buildings is responsible
for more than half of commercial building energy use and costs.
Commercial systems differ from residential ones in several
ways: While most houses and apartments rely on operable windows
and structure-related infiltration (air leaks) for fresh air,
commercial buildings often have mandatory ventilation requirements.
As the size of a commercial building increases relative to
a house, its heating, ventilating, and air conditioning (HVAC)
needs are increasingly dominated by air conditioning to reject
heat from lighting systems, equipment, and people working
in the space. Core areas of skyscrapers commonly require some
cooling in every month of the year. On the other hand, the
ability to introduce large amounts of outdoor air with the
mechanical system allows using outdoor air instead of mechanical
air conditioning whenever interior loads heat the building
but it is cool outdoors. This "economizer" mode
uses the fan more and the refrigeration compressor less, and
can save serious money, particularly in regions with large
daily temperature swings.
Buildings
smaller than 10,000 to 20,000 square feet usually use factory-built,
air-cooled "unitary" (packaged) equipment. Buildings
larger than 100,000 square feet and multi-building campuses
generally use water-cooled "built-up" or site-assembled
systems that are engineered for the specific situation. In
between, buildings may employ multiple large packaged units
(for example, one unit per wing of an office building) or
small built-up systems. The use of very large packaged units
(20 to 60 tons) of cooling capacity is growing.
The packaged
air conditioners used in smaller buildings should incorporate
a way to introduce and condition ventilation air from outside.
Most are roof-top units (RTUs), which often contain a gas
furnace section ("year-round" unit) or function
as a heat pump in winter. Packaged units are used in two-thirds
of all commercial floor space in the United States and dominate
the market for small projects and low-rise construction [U.S.
Department of Energy. 2001. Energy
Consumption Characteristics of Commercial Building HVAC Systems.
Volume 1: Chillers, Refrigerant Compressors, and Heating Systems.
Prepared by Arthur D. Little, Inc. Washington, D.C.: U.S.
Department of Energy].
In general,
central equipment systems are more costly to install and maintain
than packaged equipment systems. Because water-cooled chillers
can be very efficient, the conventional wisdom is that chilled-water
systems are more efficient than unitary systems. However,
"parasitic" (non-chiller) loads of pumps and fans
in central systems can be as high as the chiller's peak demand
[U.S. Department of Energy. 1999. Energy
Consumption Characteristics of Commercial Building HVAC Systems.
Volume II: Thermal Distribution, Auxiliary Equipment, and
Ventilation. Prepared by Arthur D. Little, Inc. Washington,
D.C.: U.S. Department of Energy]. Thus, performance comparisons
between unitary and built-up systems, or among systems of
either type, must examine the performance of the entire system,
not just the chiller or the condensing unit. The table below
gives an overview of the systems we mention.
| Characteristics
and Typical Applications of Various Cooling Systems
|
Characteristics
|
Air-Cooled
Packaged
Equipment |
Water-Cooled
Packaged
Equipment |
Air-Cooled
Chilled-Water System |
Water-Cooled
Chilled-Water System
|
|
Building
Height
|
Typically
limited to 1- to 4-story buildings
|
Unlimited
|
Unlimited
|
Unlimited
|
|
Minimum
Cooling Capacity
|
No
limitation for modular systems
|
Typically
cost-effective for projects >20 tons
|
Typically
cost-effective for projects >100 tons
|
Typically
cost-effective for projects >200 tons
|
|
Cooling
Control
|
Low
|
Low-moderate
|
High
|
High
|
|
Maintenance
|
Low
|
Moderate-high
|
Moderate
|
High
|
|
Installed
Cost
|
Low
|
Moderate-high
|
High
|
High
|
|
Operating
Costs
(energy and water)
|
Moderate
|
Low-moderate
(climate dependent)
|
Moderate-high
|
Low
|
|
Typical
Applications
|
1-
to 2-story buildings
|
1-
to 2-story buildings in hot/dry climates
|
Medium
to large facilities with limited access to water or
maintenance
|
Medium
to very large facilities and campuses
|
Choosing
the right HVAC system can be a daunting task. For many building
owners, comfort is even more important than building energy
costs or efficiency. Thermal discomfort, noise, and ventilation
problems can affect worker productivity and tenant satisfaction.
Poorly designed systems that do not respond to occupant needs
can lead to occupant distraction, loss of business, and even
lawsuits. In an office tenant study conducted by the Building
Owners and Managers Association International (BOMA), HVAC
systems were identified as the worst management, operation,
and design problem (Pens, Alton J., and Sandy Beard. 1988.
Office Tenant Moves and
Changes. Washington, D.C.: Building Owners and Managers
Association International). In this context, operating costs
include both energy costs and system maintenance. Unfortunately,
the present literature on maintenance costs does not support
strong inferences about relative cost advantages of any particular
technology, even at the level of unitary versus built-up systems.
What is known is that costs vary enormously from building
to building. It seems possible to operate a building well,
saving money, by adopting a disciplined approach.
We provide
information here on how to select, operate, and maintain specific
types of heating and cooling equipment, including packaged
equipment, central cooling equipment (e.g., central chiller
systems), and heating equipment.
Maximizing
HVAC System Performance
Reducing
heating and cooling loads is the first step in maximizing
HVAC system energy performance. For example, more efficient
lighting systems and office
equipment, as well as better window and roof systems,
can significantly reduce cooling loads. By carefully managing
building loads, you can reduce the size and cost of the HVAC
equipment. In addition, a more appropriately sized system
HVAC system will provide improved thermal comfort and may
achieve better ventilation. High-performance HVAC systems
require commitment from the building owner and careful coordination
of those involved in system design, specification, installation,
and operation and maintenance. Facility managers need to appreciate
the entire process. Increased attention to design at the outset
of a project can result in systems that cost less to install
and less to operate, and a regular maintenance routine can
facilitate high performance throughout the life of the equipment.
Notes
on HVAC Efficiency and Programs
A wide
range of efficiencies is available in packaged equipment,
chillers, boilers, and furnaces. In most cases, however, there
are legal minimum energy efficiency standards. For example,
the National Appliance Energy Conservation Act (NAECA) and
the Energy Policy Act (EPAct) established minimum-efficiency
standards for furnaces, boilers, and packaged equipment to
which manufacturers must comply. In general, NAECA applies
to smaller equipment and EPAct governs larger equipment. Many
of the EPAct standards are based on those developed for the
American Society of Heating, Refrigerating, and Air-conditioning
Engineers (ASHRAE) Standard 90.1. The ASHRAE standard also
includes efficiency requirements for many types of equipment
not covered by EPAct, such as chillers. This standard has
been adopted as the commercial building energy code in many
states and localities.
Several
groups have defined higher energy efficiency target levels
for utility incentive programs and federal facility managers
to use. For example, the Consortium
for Energy Efficiency (CEE) has established peak efficiency
tiers for packaged air conditioners and heat pumps, which
its utility members promote to their customers. And the Federal
Energy Management Program (FEMP), in response to regulations
directing federal agencies to purchase products that fall
in the upper 25 percent of energy and water efficiency, has
developed purchasing recommendations for large, water-cooled
chillers, commercial unitary air conditioners and heat pumps,
and commercial boilers. The New
Buildings Institute's "E-Benchmark" gives prescriptive
recommendations for high-efficiency equipment (New Buildings
Institute. 2003. Energy
Benchmark for High Performance Buildings. White Salmon,
Wash.: New Buildings Institute). Utilities in California,
Minnesota, New Jersey, and the Northeast all promote high-efficiency
equipment. The slist of utilities with programs changes regularly-check
with your local utility for the latest information.
Again,
equipment efficiency must be considered in the context of
the whole HVAC system. In a chilled-water system, for example,
although the chiller is at the core of the system and typically
is the single largest energy user, simply selecting a high-efficiency
chiller does not guarantee high performance. Auxiliary equipment
(such as fans and blowers) and design decisions (such as "approach
temperatures") can have substantial effects on efficiency.
Thus, attention to overall system design and auxiliary components
is critical to achieving optimal performance and comfort.
In packaged air-conditioning systems, leaky ductwork, improper
sizing, refrigerant charge, and air flow rates can considerably
affect energy performance.
Finally,
remember the importance of the economizer for "free"
cooling-cooling by circulating outdoor air when conditions
allow. The value of the economizer varies with climate, being
greater where there are larger daily temperature swings and
generally cooler temperatures. Where humidity at moderate
temperatures may be very high (e.g., the Southeast), "enthalpy"
controls prevent the introduction of relatively cool but humid
air that will make the indoors uncomfortable.
|