
The Alliance for Materials Manufacturing Excellence (AMMEX) consists of companies and organizations in the materials manufacturing sector-aluminum, chemicals, forest products, glass, metal casting, and steel-along with several non-profit stakeholders.
The Administration’s FY2013 budget request seeks $290 million for DOE’s Advanced Manufacturing Office (AMO). This amount, while significantly higher than recent appropriations, reflects the President’s commitment to a robust and competitive manufacturing sector as stated in the State of the Union. However, with the increased budget comes a significant restructuring of the program and some uncertainty of its direction. This is causing some concern with stakeholders engaged with AMO programs and other industrial energy efficiency supporters.
AMMEX applauds the Administration’s support for DOE and AMO and shares its goals for increased energy efficiency and enhanced competitiveness in the U.S. manufacturing sector. AMMEX provides the following suggestions for bolstering AMO activities in support of these goals. This request reflects both the focus the President has placed on manufacturing as well as recent Congressional intent on the importance of the individual programs in the Advanced Manufacturing Office:
The following graph displays AMO/ITP's budget since 1998, including funding for combined heat and power, deployment and IACs, cross-cutting R&D, and Industries of the Future R&D. The 2012 and 2013 budgets substantially reorganize the program.
AMMEX has played an active role in supporting S. 661, which, if passed by the Senate, would establish:
The full text of S. 661 can be found here.
AMMEX strongly supports the passage of this bill, and has held a briefing urging the full allocation of authorized funds laid out in the legislative lanugage. View AMMEX's S. 661 appropriations request here.
On September 25, 2007, Larry Kavanagh of the American Iron and Steel Institute testified on behalf of AMMEX to the House Science and Technology Committee's Energy and Environment Subcommittee. In his testimony, Mr. Kavanagh advocated for increased funding of ITP as a component of EISA, which was passed in December 2007. His full written testimony can be viewed here.
In 2005, AMMEX published a white paper addressing the allegations that ITP was effectively engaging in "corporate welfare." The key point of the document was that companies put money into the research just like DOE. With its public-private partnerships, ITP initiatives include industrial firms as co-investors in projects the government has deemed appropriate for federal funding. Firms enjoy benefits at the same time DOE does—when a successful technology is deployed. The full text of the document can be viewed here.